Loading…
Comparison · 2026
The right lender database depends on who you are. Investor-research platforms serve people allocating capital; borrowers raising debt need check sizes, deal-team contacts, and deal-fit filtering. Here’s the honest comparison.
| PitchBook | Preqin | TerraNova | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built for | Investors, PE/VC research | Institutional allocators & LPs | Borrowers raising debt |
| Private credit fund coverage | Broad (part of larger platform) | Broad (alternatives-focused) | 912 active funds, debt-only focus |
| Check-size ranges | Limited | Limited | Every fund (158 flagged estimates, rest sourced) |
| Deal-team contacts | Some | Some | 4,773 contacts, 3,798 verified emails |
| Cost | Enterprise (five figures/yr) | Enterprise (five figures/yr) | Free search; $19 per contact unlock |
| Best when you | Research investors & comps | Allocate capital to funds | Need to actually reach lenders for a raise |
Competitor details are our understanding of their public positioning as of July 2026 — verify against their current materials for procurement decisions. TerraNova coverage counts are live from the dataset.
Yes. TerraNova lets you search 912 active private credit funds free with no account — scored against your deal's amount, structure, sector, and geography. Direct deal-team contacts unlock for a one-time $19 per fund.
Both are investor-research platforms built for people who invest IN funds, not borrowers seeking debt FROM them. Coverage of lender check sizes and direct deal-team contacts is limited, and pricing is enterprise. For a borrower running a raise, a purpose-built matcher is the right tool.
Four things: check-size ranges (so you don't pitch the wrong size), deal-team contacts (not info@ inboxes), freshness (funds die and mandates change), and filtering by your deal — structure, sector, geography — not just name search.
Score 912 active funds against your deal in 60 seconds — no account, no sales call.